MOBILEHOME PARK SCAM ALERT
***

Những Thủ Đọan Bất Lương của Chủ Đất

 UPDATED ON: Thursday November 19, 2009 04:48 PM
Please Press F5 or Refresh for new update  *** For Public Good, No Copyright
www.mobilehomedispute.com | www.mobilehomeparkscam.net  |  http://www.mscam.org/
Contact me  *** your correction, opinion, and ideas will be appreciated  ***send to me
  

Since 03-02-09

I sold the house for $25000 and moved out.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Nội Dung

 1) Highlights
2) Why we fight against Park Owners?
3) Dispute Letters
4) Web Links, Blog, Discussion
5) Unjust Enrichment (How Scam Work)
6) What Can We Do?
7) What do Mobilehome Owners really want?
8) Why over $1500 per month  , abandon mobilehome?
9
) Mobilehome Payment Calculation  
10) The only way to sell your mobilehome
11) Park owners have no right to increase 10% and 5%

12) California Law on Inflation adjustment rate  annually
13) W
hy people want to buy a mobile home???
14) Who creates the injustice?
15) Reports On the Press
1) Những điểm chính yếu
2) Tại sao phải đấu tranh chống Chủ Đất ???
3) Thư khiếu tố và Tài liệu
4) Khiếu kiện trên mạng, Diễn đàn Thảo Luận
5) Làm giầu bất chánh (cách thức lừa gạt)
6) Chúng ta sẽ làm ǵ ???

7) Các vị chủ nhà thực sư muốn ǵ ?

8) Tiền thuê tăng hơn $1500 một tháng, nên bỏ nhà ??
9) Số Tiền phải trả cho nhà tiền chế 
10) Làm sao để bán đuợc nhà
11) Chủ đất không có quyền tăng 10 hay 5 phần trăm tiền thuê

12) Luật Tiểu Bang quy định tỷ lệ lạm phát hàng năm
13)
Tại sao có nguời thích mua nhà Tiền chế   ???
14) Ai tạo ra bất công?
15) Tuờng Tŕnh của cơ quan truyền thông

Who create the Injustice?

Ai tạo ra sự bất công?

Who support  and who oppose  the fairness?
 
Who really work for the residents, consumers,  and the poor?
9/17/2009 What is AB 566?  
  • What is AB 566?
    ** http://omha.info/blog/?p=19
    ** AB 566 (Nava),
    Pedro Nava  
    sponsored by local governments, would give local governments, and mobilehome park residents, more tools to protect mobilehome parks and existing rent control protections. GSMOL will be working to ensure the bill addresses the needs of residents.

    ** AB 566 (Nava) Mobile Home Park Conversion Requirements - When converting an existing mobilehome park to private ownership, the Subdivision Map Act requires subdividers to obtain a survey that gauges the mobile home park resident's support for the proposed conversion. AB 566 takes this requirement one step further by requiring a majority of the residents of a mobile home park to demonstrate support for the parks conversion to private ownership. As introduced, the bill also permitted local agencies to enact ordinances to prevent "sham" conversions and preserve affordable housing.
     
  • http://www.gsmol.org/breakingnews.html
    AB 566 Passes Senate!
    ** September 09, 2009
    NEED CALLS TO ASSEMBLY
    In the end, the vote, 21-14, showed bi-partisan support (and some bi-partisan disappointments) on this critical measure. The broad coalition effort led not only to several the 21 AYE votes but also changed several no votes, including Republicans Harman and Benoit, to "not voting."
    The senate vote was:

    AYES
    ****
    Alquist Asburn Cedillo Corbett Correa
    DeSaulnier Ducheny Florez Hancock Kehoe
    Leno Lowenthal Oropeza
    Padilla Pavley Price Romero
    Simitian Steinberg Wiggins Wolk

    NOES
    ****
    Aanestad Cogdill
    Calderon Cox Denham Dutton
    Hollingsworth Huff Maldonado
    Runner Strickland Walters Wyland Yee

    ABSENT, ABSTAINING, OR NOT VOTING
    *********************************

    Benoit Harman Negrete McLeod Liu Wright

    BUT WE ARE NOT DONE. Parkowners will now turn their attention to the Assembly, where they will try to prevent the majority of Assemblymembers from casting an AYE vote on concurrence.
     

" .... Yet your begging is not enough because their land now is different from 20 years ago due to its appreciation and the increasing  population.  If 20 years ago they invite you to live in their park forever, then now they sell their park, convert their park to condominium ownership and evict your family without any compensation under State Governor support. This conversion requires evictions to all of the mobilehome tenants, disregard  the Detrimental Reliance/Estoppel doctrine. Your property becomes worthless. No one want to buy it; still you must pay the unlimited new higher rent until you cannot afford and abandon your home.  They don't like minority of poor, retirees, non-working, handicapped, unemployed families, including your children. ...... "

 


NOES
****

Adams Anderson Bill Berryhill Tom Berryhill
Blakeslee Charles
Calderon Conway DeVore
Fletcher Fuller
Gaines Garrick Gilmore Hagman
Harkey Jeffries Knight
Logue Miller Nestande
Niello Nielsen Silva Smyth
Audra Strickland
Tran 
(Van Tran ) Villines


ABSENT, ABSTAINING, OR NOT VOTING
*********************************

Bradford Buchanan Lieu
Hernandez Portantino
Solorio  (Jose Solorio)Carter

 

  • Sonoma No Condo Conversion Coalition: AB566 Vetoed
    By SONOCONDO
    Expect the park owners and their lawyers Close and Loftin to step up conversions of mobilehome parks in cities and counties with mobilehome rent control. Cities, stung by recent court defeats, will be reluctant to put up much resistance
    Schwarzenegger vetoed AB566 yesterday, saying he didn't like the idea that cities could take the views of residents into consideration and turn down a conversion if most residents
    oppose it -- even if ALL residents oppose it. 
    "why buy a home in a park where it could convert to condo's tomorrow."  (pdf)
     
  • Governor Vetoes AB 566

    We have just learned the unfortunate news that the Governor has vetoed AB 566.  Of course, we all greatly disappointed. Those living in parks where conversions are pending or the threat of conversion is looming desperately need the
    protections that this bill would provide.

    "I am returning Assembly Bill 566 without my signature.
     
    While the intent of this bill is to preserve low-income housing, the fact that a majority of mobilehome park residents do not support a conversion is not an appropriate means for determining the legitimacy of a conversion.  The law is not intended to allow park residents to block a request to subdivide.   
     
    For this reason I am unable to sign this bill. "

     
  • Schwarzenegger funny thinking is that he is afraid the home owners to block the park owners, but he allows the park owners to block home owners  to sell their mobile home by increasing rent unlimitedly and because of ""why buy a home in a park where it could convert to condo's tomorrow."  (pdf)

    The park owners lose nothing in any situation, even if they cannot convert to condo. Still, the residents will lose their mobile home sooner or later. 
    Schwarzenegger does not know that the higher the space rent the lower the value of the mobilehome. He mistakenly treat the mobile home owners as tenants who have no property, basically the same as if they were renting an apartment. And when the conversion begins it will disregard the Detrimental Reliance/Estoppels doctrine. 

    The mobilehome owners lose their property because they wrongly believe the park owners promise/make them believe that they could rent the space forever or at least a long term. They wrongly believed that they would be compensated for their property if the park owners do not keep their promise.

    In fact, the Schwarzenegger  allows the park owners to rob their mobile home property with high rent, unable to sell, and unable to sublease. The mobile home owners lose the
    hope that they can ask the park owners compensate their property by "requiring a majority of the residents of a mobile home park to demonstrate support for the parks conversion to private ownership."

                        
    Any healthy thinking person can see that the park owners could persuade a majority of residents for the conversion with an appropriate compensation based on  the Detrimental Reliance/Estoppels doctrine.  Yet, now with the veto, the park owners do not need to persuade or follow  the Detrimental Reliance/Estoppels doctrine.  Moreover,  nobody/no attorney wants to bring them to justice for only $2000, the maximum amount specified in the" Civil Code Sec. 798.86 Management Penalty for Willful Violation 46." This law created by legislators for the purpose to prevent in advance any attempt to sue their boss. How about DOJ? Forget about it. They are established for fighting games between rich people and for the tyranny of majority of rich and middle income level.

    Think about this: "If the increase  tax up to 90% on rich people must require a majority vote, then I am not sure how this governor can make a decision with his funny face"  This is an example for how the meaning of majority in a democracy society can deter the future injustice. Unfortunately, the majority requirement is nothing for Schwarzenegger. I guess that he graduated with an extra honor master degree from China or a Ph.D from North Korea.

    You can see more on how the tyranny of the majority of rich and middle income works
     
  • Letter of the day: Mobile-home veto hurts
    Daily Breeze
    The governor's veto all but assured that these senior citizens have no voice in the conversion of mobile home parks from rent-controlled senior parks. ...
     
  • http://www.gsmol.org/breakingnews.html

    AB 566 passed the Assembly ** September 11, 2009
    now headed to the Governor!

     AYES
    ****

    Ammiano Arambula Beall Block
    Blumenfield Brownley Cook Caballero
    Chesbro Coto Davis De La Torre
    De Leon Eng Evans Feuer
    Galgiani Fong Emmerson Fuentes Furutani Hayashi
    Hill Hall Huffman Huber Jones Krekorian
    Bonnie Lowenthal Ma Mendoza Monning
    Nava John A. Perez V. Manuel Perez
    Ruskin Salas Saldana Skinner
    Swanson Torlakson Torres Torrico
    Yamada Bass

     
9/10/2009 What is AB 761?  
http://www.gsmol.org/breakingnews.html

What is AB 761?
(Calderon) - Charles M. Calderon Dem   OPPOSE -

AB 761, a very dangerous bill that would allow huge rent increases when manufactured homes in rental communities are sold, passed out of the Assembly Housing Committee and could be taken to a vote of the entire Assembly at any time. Please contact your Assemblymember immediately and urge them to vote “NO” on AB 761. You can find the contact information of your Assemblymember by going to this website and entering your zip code: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/yourleg.html  Call or fax them today! Here are some talking points to use when mentioning AB 761:

AB 761 is a dangerous bill that would remove the protections of rent control at the time of sale, and allow the park owner to increase the rent to the next purchaser. Increased rents result in decreases in the MH sales price. This will also lead to a domino effect that will impact homeowners in non-rent controlled areas, as well.

.... to read more ....
http://www.gsmol.org/breakingnews.html
 

 
Charles M. Calderon Dem  
OPPOSE -


 

Why allow the park owner to negotiate the rent to the next purchaser? The answer is that: "Based on supply and demand, land owners need money to improve the park (even though, the cost has been included in the rent). If manager increase 30% on the space rent for the next purchaser, then nobody wants to buy.  So, they will auto adjust to 20% then 10% .... So they need to have the right to interfere with the sale...  so  and so... "

It is the most intellectual explanation because if no body wants to buy the mobile home, park managers lose nothing.  Land owners lose nothing.  Yet, home owner cannot sell the house, cannot tolerate the high rent, cannot escape the park ....  He/she will abandon the house sooner or later.  Park managers and land owners happily, unfairly, unethically get the extra benefits from the abandoned house as a gift to improve the park.  In other words, Land owners do not need to adjust the negotiation price for the next purchaser. What they really/secretly need is to increase, increase, and increase the space rent  forever under the protection of the law, legislators, governor, state, county, local government, Department of Joke, and even the judges.

In fact,  Land Owners do not need the AB 761 (it allows the park owner to increase the rent to the next purchaser)  because they have implemented the 10% increase for the next purchaser  as long as 30 years ago disregard State written law and still apply this 10% until today. It does not matter for the AB 761 need to confirm or legalize their act.

Do you want proof/evidence? Please read the following  letters from park manager and land owner's attorney to see how they increased the rent to the next purchaser.

  • Sandal Wood Attorney Letter  05/29/2009 (pdf)
  • Lich 03/02/2009 Letter      (pdf) (html)(doc)
  • Lich 03/02/2009 Sent to Legislators  (pdf) (doc)
  • ParkManager 03/02/2009  Letter (pdf) (doc)
  • Lich 02/19/2009 Letter          (pdf) (doc)
  • Lich 02/19/2009 Notice Intent to Sale  (pdf) (doc)
  • ParkManager 03/02/2009  Notice (pdf) (doc)
  • Form Intent to Sale (pdf) (doc)
  • SANDALWOOD  Lease Agreement 2004   (pdf) (doc)
    All Letters  (big file) (pdf)

They do not need to legalize their unjust enrichment and they do not worry about their unfair/unethical pratice because no attorney wants to receive only $2000 to bring their scam /unjust enrichment /injustice /criminal to court

Civil Code Sec. 798.86 :"..be awarded an amount not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000) for each willful violation of this chapter by the management .."   

I believe that Sacramento is under control by young female/male lobbyists who receive salary from land owners and the rich.  To win this battle, instead of hiring attorneys we should hire young beautiful/handsome lobbyists. There are a lot of young people drop out of college. Their fresh/ beauty/ innocent/ first-time lobbying  will defeat the fat/ old /stink lobbyists  and change the law.  We do not need the court system any more as long as people cannot close their eyes to the beauty. It may be easier to give them $2000 to change assembly/ officer/ senator's decision than to hire an attorney.  Lobbyists should replace the law and court system; and they really reduce enormous cost/deficit for US.

BILLS   
SENATE BILLS 
http://www.gsmol.org/


SB 23 (Padilla) - Padilla, Alex SUPPORT - Passed the Senate (36-0). Scheduled in Assembly Housing Committee on July 8th. Urge your Assemblymember to Support. Description: Would require mobilehome parks to develop, implement, and post an emergency and fire safety plan; would allow cities and counties to adopt more stringent regulations.

SB 804 (Leno)  Leno, Mark SUPPORT -Passed the Senate (28-6). Referred to Assembly Housing and Judiciary; to be heard in Asm. Housing on July 8th. Description: Would prohibit a park from requiring a homeowner, who is replacing a mobilehome or manufactured home on a space in the park, to use a specific broker, dealer, or other person as an agent in the purchase or installation of the replacement home.

SB 111 (Correa)  Correa, Lou SUPPORT - Bill passed Assembly Housing (4-2) and is now pending on Assembly Floor. Urge your Assemblymember to Support. Description: Would reorganize the MRL to clean it up and make it more user-friendly by combining certain related sections and cleaning up other portions of the code.

Addresses:
http://www.sen.ca.gov/
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/sen-addresses.html

 

Addresses:
http://www.assembly.ca.gov/
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/asm-addresses.html
 

ASSEMBLY BILLS
http://www.gsmol.org/


AB 481
(Ma) - OPPOSE - Not Heard in Assembly Housing, Two-year bill that may be heard in January
Description: Would provide that a mobilehome that is not owner-occupied would not be subject to local rent controls

AB 566 (Nava) -
Pedro Nava Dem 35th  SUPPORT - Failed passage by one vote June 23 in Sen. Transportation & Housing Committee, granted reconsideration. Expected to be reheard July 7, 2009. Description: Would require that the currently-mandated survey of residents of a park slated for conversion to condominiums demonstrate that a majority of the residents support the conversion. The bill also would state that localities may enact reasonable measures to prevent sham conversions or to preserve affordable housing.

AB 761
(Calderon) - Charles M. Calderon Dem  OPPOSE - Passed off Assembly Floor on June 25th, upon re-consideration. Expected to be referred to Senate Judiciary Committee. Hearing date unknown. Description: Would impose vacancy de-control restrictions on local mobilehome rent control ordinances. Upon a sale or vacancy of a mobilehome, the space rent would be set by the park, at market rate (i.e., "vacancy decontrol"). The bill would destroy billions of dollars of homeowner equity.

AB 869 (Mendoza) -  Tony Mendoza Dem 56th SPONSOR - Bill will be taken up in January. Description: Would create a program of certification for, and continuing education of, mobilehome park managers.

AB 1108 (Fuentes) - Felipe Fuentes Dem 39th SUPPORT - Passed Senate Utilities Committee. Headed to Senate Appropriations. Urge your member to support. Description: Would make various changes to requirements when electric or gas utilities are provided to mobilehome park residents and residential tenants through a master meter, including the following: (1) would allow the Public Utilities Commission to order repairs and maintenance of system; (2) Directs that the rate differential received by park owners be directed toward maintenance and repair; and (3) Would limit late fees on utility bills.
 

 

9/01/2009  Who really work for you?  
  • The Park Owner Unjust Enrichment + The Injustice Mobilehome Residency Law

    How To Take Advantage Of Today's Real Estate Market: Investing In ...  (pdf format)


    NuWire Investor
    There are many reasons to buy a mobile home park. For one, there are virtually no new ones that can ever be built, effectively capping supply. Another is that you can raise and raise the rent, and nobody can afford the $3,000 or so to move out, so they have to put up with it. Or maybe it’s the fact that mobile home parks are sold on higher cap rates than any other form of real estate.
     

  • SACRAMENTO — Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill on Friday that would have preserved rent-control protections for residents of mobile home parks that are partially converted to condominium ownership
    http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2007/

    In a statement released by her office, Evans called the veto "reckless and cold-hearted," saying that thousands of seniors and working-class families "now face being put out on the street. They were counting on the governor, and he really let them down."
     (pdf format)

                                            
     
     
  • Tailored trailers: the return of the mobile home
    However, it’s not all rosy: landowners wield a lot of power over their sites and, it’s claimed, often harass and intimidate residents. “The Mobile Home Act of 1983 was supposed to give homeowners security but there’s a need for more protection from unscrupulous landowners,” says Ball.

    Site landlords are also entitled to a 10 per cent commission on the sale of a home but many try to prevent residents selling on the open market. This, says Ball, is because they prefer to sell directly to new residents, getting a chance to renegotiate rents and profit from the entire sale.   (pdf format)

     

  • Mobile home residents march on AmCan city hall
    Vallejo Times-Herald
    By Sarah Rohrs /Times-Herald staff writer AMERICAN CANYON -- Angry their mobile home park could be changing for the worse, about 40 residents descended ...

    "The city has to stand up to this problem," Pohrman said. "This has been going on way too long." She added seniors may become homeless as the mobile home park is converted.  (PDF)

    You can force city to work for the fairness
     

  • Judge Tells Mobile Home Park Owners to Pay Up
    City Watch
    The owner, GJ Park Associates, and the Park's management, MA Cirillo & Associates (dba Star Mobile Home Park Management) maintained that the Park was well ...

    "..I did my homework and learned a great deal about the landlord behind the increase, a billionaire real estate titan with a deep disdain for bureaucracy, well known to the financial world as a ‘vulture investor’. (pdf format)
     

1. PDF Báo Viễn Đông  (11 July 2009) pdf
2. PDF Báo Nguời Việt (11 July 2009) pdf

3. http://www.nguoi-viet.com/   (*11 July 2009) by Trần Danh Thăng  (pdf)


4. http://www.nguoi-viet.com/absolutenm/  Hội Thảo
Nghị Sĩ Lou Correa (07 july 2009)
 

  • YouTube:
    Rent control for mobile homes - Modesto Bee news
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcl8mJk8tcw
     
  • Escondido Democratic Club » Ciry Council report: mobile home rent ...
    By mmliles

    This representative stated that the park owners were essentially subsidizing the residents by charging much less ground rent than the market would bear. Olga pointed out that the rent-controlled residents owned their mobile homes, were responsible for maintaining their homes, and so also had property rights that needed to be protected. Olga stated that suggesting such subsidization was insulting to the mobile home owners.
    (pdf format)
     
  • CONSUMER PRICE INDEX:  JUNE 2009

    http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm

    " .. After declining in each of the three previous months, the housing index was unchanged in June. The index for shelter rose 0.1 percent for the second straight month, as did the indexes of two of its major components, rent and owners' equivalent rent. Also within shelter, the index for lodging away from home rose 0.3 percent in June but has fallen 6.9 percent over the last year. ...."
    http://www.bls.gov/cpi/  
    (PDF)
     

  • Jeff Ackerman: Elderly find mobile homes anything but mobile   (PDF)
    The Union of Grass Valley
    I'm a HUGE fan of older people and unless we at least consider some sort of rent control on our local mobile home parks, many of our older people will be homeless soon. For them, it's a race between death and despair.
    ...
    What some of you may not know is that there are hundreds of older people trapped inside their so-called “mobile” homes today. After all, most of those homes really aren't mobile. And, if you could move one, it would cost more to do it than the home is worth today...

    Fear is a powerful tool, as most of us today are well aware. And some of these mobile home park owners seem to know how to use fear to their advantage. An 85-year-old is no match for a smooth-talking suit from Los Angeles. 
     (PDF)
     
  • Rent control across the nation and world:  Still, please notice that the rent law on apartment and mobilehome should be different due to property right.
     
    • Rent Controls in Ontario Rent Control Myths
       
    • LA Rent Control Made Simple
      " ... You signed an agreement or otherwise started paying rent for your rent controlled unit at a rate which was advertised and you agreed to pay. However, that may be an illegal rent, and your remedies are powerful, including getting a drastic rent reduction and recovering triple the amount of any overcharge from the correct rate... "
       (pdf)
 The tyranny of the majority of rich and middle income  

... Legislators carefully protect their boss by discourage you/attorney to sue the land owner through "Civil Code Sec. 798.86 Management Penalty for Willful Violation 46

 "If a homeowner or former homeowner of a park is the prevailing party in a civil action, including a small claims court action, against the management to enforce his or her rights under this chapter, the homeowner, in addition to damages afforded by law, may, in the discretion of the court, be awarded an amount not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000) for each willful violation of this chapter by the management .."  (Amended by AB 693 (Corbett), Ch. 98 (2003), eff. 1/1/04)

They lose only $2000; even though they take million dollars from thousand mobile home owners for unfair charge 5%,10% on increase rent, transfer title, and abandoned houses. Their unjust enrichment is not only one year as Property Tax nor one time as Sale Tax, but from month to month, year to year, increase forever, never decrease for deflation or economic downturn, and the unjust enrichment keep going from the beginning day of establishment the park; and after 30 years it still increase. 

They lose only $2000; even though their managers' extreme/ outrageous conduct intentionally/ recklessly cause severe emotional distress on your family from month to month, and year to year.


"
Fear is a powerful tool, as most of us today are well aware. And some of these mobile home park owners seem to know how to use fear to their advantage.  "(PDF)

"He blocked sales saying homes would be dragged around the park, threatening and shouting abuse at people. It was absolutely horrendous," she said.

Because of "not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000) " no attorney wants to bring this scam/crime/fraud to justice.  Their smart law from  the land owners' legislator kills any attempt/dream from local city and the court as it could happen in the past:

" ... You signed an agreement or otherwise started paying rent for your rent controlled unit at a rate which was advertised and you agreed to pay. However, that may be an illegal rent, and your remedies are powerful, including getting a drastic rent reduction and recovering triple the amount of any overcharge from the correct rate... "  (pdf)

Such mobile home law you can see in any communist or tyrant regime to protect their party members.  It also happens in US as fathers of US Constitution predicted the oppression era by the tyranny of the majority of rich and middle income on the minority of poor retirees, non-working, handicapped, unemployed families, including your children.


(Amended by AB 693 Corbett,

The majority of rich and middle income, strong, talented, well educated, intelligent, smart, witty, high skill .... learn so much about how to coerce/oppress/abuse the minority of weak, poor, and disabled people.  They should learn one important lesson instead of all what they have learned:  "The veil of ignorance"
Google search for  (define: property rights)
"Property is any physical or virtual entity that is owned by an individual or jointly by a group of individuals. An owner of property has the right to consume, sell, rent, mortgage, transfer and exchange his or her property. ..."

However, the California Mobile home Residency Law kills the property right of the homeowners by restricting sublease:

798.23.5 SUBLEASING
"" A homeowner shall be permitted to rent or sublet pursuant to paragraph (1) if a medical emergency or medical treatment requires the homeowner to be absent from his or her home and this is confirmed in writing by an attending physician... "

" The minimum term of the rental or sublease shall be six months, unless the management approves a shorter term, but no greater than 12 months, unless management approves a longer term. " ....



(Added by SB 1410 (Chesbro), Ch. 672 (2002), eff. 1/1/03)

By restricting sublease (798.23.5) and exempting on rent control (798.17) the California Mobilehome Residency Law 2009 kills the property right of the homeowners. This allows for the park owners to steal the value and in other words to rob mobile homes from innocent people. The law makers mistakenly treat the mobile home owners as tenants who have no property, basically the same as if they were renting an apartment. 

Not only restricting the rent, they also interfere with the sale/ exchange/ transfer by increasing the space rent under the name "new rent negotiation for next purchaser."

All of them, land owners, legislators, government, judges do not need to know that the higher the space rent the lower the price of the house for sale.

The land owners, the rich, the middle, or  the tyrant majority acted as if  they created the earth. The land is not belong to the nation or human or sentient beings. It is belong to them as long as 2000 years ago before their ancestors were born.  They can do whatever on their land because they bought/purchased the land from 1cent/sq.ft and now it worths $150/sq.ft. They can rent the land for any high price. Imagine when the majority of rich and midle income buy all of the land on the earth. If you do not have a space to live, or cannot bear their high charge, then go to the sea. You are second human.

It may be the reason for the communists to be alive after killing 200 millions people.  And there will be another killing for billions with a new tech/bio invention available for anyone. I believe that most of people kill each others not because they understand, misunderstand, or do not understand the idea of communism, socialism, capitalism, the idea of god, or something intellectual .... but because of their hatred and willing to revenge.  Their hatred comes from their frustration, despair,  hopelessness under the tyrant minority as well as majority ... day by day, month by month .... grow up little by little ... cannot stop ... cannot alter/change ... like terrorists or Timothy McVeigh.  Such hatred people do not want to live. The problem is that they want to die not alone but want to pull others to die with them as in Modern suicide bombing.

Do I commit a Slippery Slope argument? Wait and see.  I just believe that the adoption of one injustice policy will lead to the adoption of another injustice.

Contact me  *** your correction, opinion, and ideas will be appreciated  *** send to me
  

Since 03-02-09
Home | u2 | u3 |
  u4 u5 u6Big html
tranlich.info:2095 | tranlich.com:2095

 

Top|Home